Resultado da Busca
3 de set. de 2016 · I suggest you load the amsmath package, employ its the bmatrix ("bracketed matrix") environment, and use \dots (or \ldots), \vdots ("vertical dots"), and \ddots ("diagonal dots") as needed. The following screenshot shows two ways this approach could be employed. The first replicates the matrix shown in the OP's posting.
13 de abr. de 2017 · I need to typeset a matrix with square brackets as delimiters for math.se (I believe they use MathJaX). How would I do that?
10 de nov. de 2011 · I'm trying to create a pmatrix whose components are rather complicated fractions (Christoffel symbols), and the line spacing is too small making the whole thing a bit cramped and hard to read.
18 de mar. de 2017 · Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Possible Duplicate: What's the best way make an “augmented” coefficient matrix? I am trying to make a vertical line in a matrix in LaTeXiT. I have read that it should be possible
I am new to Latex, and I have been trying to get the matrix of following form [x11 x12 x13 . . . . x1n x21 x22 x23 . . . . x2n .
29 de ago. de 2015 · I'm a new user in texmaker. How can I produce this equation? Thank you for your help
From a mathematical point of view, a matrix is a tensor. On the other hand, pure mathematics and theoretical physics mostly ignore those regulations. Doing pure mathematics, I'd not use any special notation for matrices, that are just another mathematical object which a variable is assigned to.
5 de mar. de 2013 · The amsmath package also offers the shortcut matrix environments which default to centered alignment for their columns: matrix: unbracketed matrix; pmatrix: matrix surrounded by parentheses; bmatrix: matrix surrounded by square brackets; vmatrix: matrix surrounded by single vertical lines; Vmatrix: matrix surrounded by double vertical lines
Somehow, it would make more sense if you tried to demonstrate the column manipulation, because then the triangle unit-determinant matrix would come on the right side. But even this is completely clear IMHO.
