Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. 23 de mai. de 2024 · OHCHR supports the drafting of a Comprehensive International Convention on Countering the Use of Information and Communication Technologies for Criminal Purposes (Convention) and encourages States to agree a text that complies fully with international law, including international human rights law.

  2. 16 de mai. de 2024 · The NRB Project for Digital Free Speech is a venture of NRB and is a pioneering project that monitors, documents, and advocates against threats of anti-Christian censorship and other free speech violations on the internet, and especially on communication platforms established by “new media” tech companies in the private sector ...

  3. Há 4 dias · Pseudonymity and data havens (such as Freenet) protect free speech using technologies that guarantee material cannot be removed and prevents the identification of authors. Technologically savvy users can often find ways to access blocked content.

  4. 22 de mai. de 2024 · Alongside ‘cancel culture,’ censorship poses a significant threat to free expression, especially in the digital space. With their immense influence over online discourse, tech giants have increasingly engaged in content moderation practices that disproportionately target conservative voices.

  5. 17 de mai. de 2024 · Free Expression Archives - Center for Democracy and Technology. The internet and new technologies give individuals the ability to publish and receive information, participate in political processes, and share knowledge.

  6. 16 de mai. de 2024 · Entitled Free Speech in the Digital Age: The problems of censorship and the perils of regulation, Gerson spoke about the struggle for traditional news outlets to remain viable, and analyzed whether government regulation was harming or helping the problem.

  7. Há 5 dias · What can state actors do to protect or interfere with online public discourse? The recent argument in National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo suggests that there is some outer limit of government coercion on private actors to interfere with disfavored ideas.