Resultado da Busca
To Meyer-Lübke, the spoken Vulgar form was the genuine and continuous form, while Classical Latin was a kind of artificial idealised language imposed upon it; thus Romance languages were derived from the "real" Vulgar form, which had to be reconstructed from remaining evidence.
- –
1 de ago. de 2019 · Updated on August 01, 2019. Vulgar Latin isn't filled with profanities or a slang version of Classical Latin—although there certainly were vulgar words. Rather, Vulgar Latin is the father of the Romance languages; Classical Latin, the Latin we study, is their grandfather.
The answer usually given is that Vulgar Latin was the language of the people, while Classical Latin, coming down to us as a literary language, was closer to how the elite spoke. This, however, is a very simplified—and maybe not altogether accurate—picture of how things were.
Vulgar Latin, spoken form of non-Classical Latin from which originated the Romance group of languages. Later Latin (from the 3rd century ce onward) is often called Vulgar Latin—a confusing term in that it can designate the popular Latin of all periods and is sometimes also used for so-called.
Vulgar Latin is often marked by the loss of certain forms and spellings of classical terms or even the preference for vocabulary terms that are less prominently used in Classical Latin. Additionally, Vulgar Latin tends to focus more on using prepositions rather than utilising cases.
Classical Latin is the written version of what people spoke around the turn of our era. Vulgar Latin is 20 different definitions that all boil down to "the study of variation in Latin". It's not a language and nobody spoke it.
Many of the innovations of Ecclesiastical Latin, as enumerated by Nunn, can be seen to be either influences from Greek or Vulgar Latin: The extended use of prepositions where in Classical Latin a simple case of the noun would have sufficed; The disappearance of long and elaborate sentences with many dependent clauses
