Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Van Halen. HARD ROCK · 1991. Preview. For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge contains plenty of Van Halen’s rambunctious hard rock, perfect for party time. The double entendre-laced “Poundcake” leads off the album, bursting with Eddie’s power-drill screams and Sammy’s hurts-so-good howls. But the band also flashes a serious side: The tight ...

  2. For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge is the ninth studio album by American rock band Van Halen. It was released on June 17, 1991, on Warner Bros. Records and is the third to feature vocalist Sammy Hagar. It debuted at number 1 on the Billboard 200 album chart and maintained the position for three consecutive weeks. The album marked a record in the band's history, seeing seven of its eleven tracks ...

  3. On the 24th anniversary of the release of the Van Halen album "For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge", Sammy takes you back to 1990 and 1991 when it was being writte...

    • 8 min
    • 234,1K
    • Sammy Hagar
  4. For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge (myös tunnettu lyhennetyllä nimellä F.U.C.K.) on yhdysvaltalaisen hard rock-yhtye Van Halenin yhdeksäs studioalbumi ja kolmas albumi vokalisti Sammy Hagarin kanssa. Se julkaistiin 1991 ja se voitti Best Hard Rock Performance – Grammyn .

  5. Title of Study: FOR UNLAWFUL CARNAL KNOWLEDGE: THE SATANIC PANIC IN THE UNITED STATES, 1968- 2000 Major Field: U.S. History Abstract: This thesis examines the use of new and emerging media by the religious right during the 1970s to spread the ideology and discourse of the Satanic Panic and the anti-rock movement.

  6. Warner Bros. 1991. EE UU. Para el momento en que los integrantes de Van Halen comenzaron a trabajar en su álbum For Unlawful Carnal Knowledge en marzo de 1990, habían decidido endurecer su sonido y volcarse al estilo hard rock que si bien se encontraba presente en sus anteriores producciones, muchos fans habían criticado la excesiva ...

  7. Cambridge Dept., fn.18 above, p.331. 23. In thecase of the unlawful carnal knowledge offences, the position at common law was that a man who mistakenly believed, even on reasonable grounds, that the girl was over the relevant age, had no defence. This decision was generally applied in practice to all sexual and kindred offences where the age of ...