Resultado da Busca
ASRM m€ullerian anomalies classification 2021. Samantha M. Pfeifer, M.D., Marjan Attaran, M.D., Jessica Goldstein, R.N., Steven R. Lindheim, M.D., M.M.M., John C. Petrozza, M.D., Beth W. Rackow, M.D., Evan Siegelman, M.D., Robert Troiano, M.D., Thomas Winter, M.D., Andrea Zuckerman, M.D., and Sarah D. Ramaiah, M.S.Ed.
The ASRM Müllerian Anomalies classification 2021 (MAC2021) classifies müllerian anomalies into the nine categories below. Because müllerian anomalies represent a continuum of development and many have combined elements, some anomalies appear in more than one category.
The ASRM Müllerian Anomaly Classification 2021 (MAC2021) was created with several goals in mind: Build on the known strengths, simplicity, and recognizability of the 1988 AFS Classification. Update and expand the classification to include cervical and vaginal anomalies utilizing an interactive format.
There are many proposed classification systems for müllerian anomalies. The American Fertility Society (AFS) Classification from 1988 has been the most recognized and utilized. The advantages of this iconic classification include its simplicity, recognizability, and correlation with clinical pregnancy outcomes.
9 de jun. de 2022 · ASRM Müllerian Anomalies Classification 2021: a critical review - Ludwin - 2022 - Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology - Wiley Online Library. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Opinion. Free Access. ASRM Müllerian Anomalies Classification 2021: a critical review. A. Ludwin, S. Tudorache, W. P. Martins. First published: 09 June 2022.
ASRM Müllerian Anomalies Classification 2021: a critical review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60 (1):7-21. doi: 10.1002/uog.24905. Epub 2022 Jun 9. Authors. A Ludwin 1 2 , S Tudorache 3 , W P Martins 4. Affiliations. 1 Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
ASRM Müllerian Anomalies Classification 2021: a critical review. Preparing publication...
