Resultado da Busca
R. Lanier Anderson III. Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Incumbent. Assumed office. January 31, 2009. Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. In office. May 14, 1999 – May 31, 2002.
Hon. R. Lanier Anderson III. Senior U.S. Circuit Judge. United States Court of Appeals. Eleventh Circuit. Date of Appointment: Appointed on August 6, 1979 to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which on October 1, 1981, became an appointment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Entered on Duty:
R. Lanier Anderson (Professor of Philosophy, J.E. Wallace Sterling Professor in Humanities) works in the history of late modern philosophy and has focused primarily on Kant and his influence on nineteenth century philosophy.
Nietzsche's Will to Power as a Doctrine of the Unity of Science. RL Anderson. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (5), 729-750. , 1994. 36 *. 1994. The debate over the Geisteswissenschaften in German philosophy. RL Anderson. The Cambridge history of philosophy 1945, 221-234.
Senior Associate Dean for the Humanities and Arts. CV. Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania, 1993. B.A., Yale University, 1987. My research concerns the history of late modern philosophy and connections between philosophy and literature. In late modern history, I have focused primarily on Kant and his influence on 19th century philosophy.
R. Lanier Anderson Department of Philosophy Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-2155 (650) 723-0764 560 Front Lane Mountain View, CA 94041 e-mail: lanier@stanford.edu Education Yale University University of Pennsylvania B.A., Philosophy 1987 summa cum laude, exceptional distinction in the major M.A., Philosophy 1993 Ph.D., Philosophy 1993
1 de jul. de 2018 · https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-6718810. Share. Tools. In this well-researched, philosophically rich book, R. Lanier Anderson provides a novel, compelling reconstruction of the historical context for the emergence of Kant's formative distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments.
