Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. 25 de abr. de 2024 · Muñiz’s two most recent predecessors as chief justice, Charles T. Canady and Jorge Labarga, also served consecutive terms. Muñiz and former Chief Justices Canady and Labarga declined to comment.

  2. Há 6 dias · In his dissent, Justice Jorge Labarga disagreed that Florida should recede from Shelly because it conflicts with U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Labarga notes that the Florida Constitution also confers a right against self-incrimination.

  3. 26 de abr. de 2024 · There’s more: In his sole dissent to the majority opinion, Justice Jorge Labarga warned that the ruling could “undermine the broad privacy protections that are extended in the medical context” — suggesting the state eventually could invade your doctor’s appointments more broadly than in the abortion context.

  4. 26 de abr. de 2024 · The opinion was shared by Chief Justice Carlos Muniz and Justices Charles Canady, Jorge Labarga, John Couriel, Jamie Grosshans and Renatha Francis. Justice Meredith Sasso, who joined the court...

  5. 25 de abr. de 2024 · The Supreme Court unanimously re-elected Muniz as chief justice, with his new two-year term starting July 1, the court announced Thursday. The two other most-recent chief justices, Charles Canady and Jorge Labarga, also served consecutive terms. Canady and Labarga remain on the court. Gov.

  6. 2 de mai. de 2024 · Justice Jorge Labarga dissented, pointing to part of the Florida Constitution that protects against self-incrimination. Help support the Tampa Free Press by making any small donation by clicking here. Android Users, Click To Download The Tampa Free Press App And Never Miss A Story. Follow Us On Facebook and Twitter. Sign up for our free newsletter.

  7. Há 4 dias · Tags: Carlos G. Muñiz, Charles T. Canady, Florida Supreme Court, Jamie Grosshans, John D. Couriel, Jorge Labarga, Meredith Sasso, Renatha S. Francis. This case comes to the Florida Supreme Court as two certified questions from a federal appellate court about whether an insurance company can invoke the.