Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. John Taylor (December 19, 1753 – August 21, 1824), usually called John Taylor of Caroline, was a politician and writer. He served in the Virginia House of Delegates (1779–1781, 1783–1785, 1796–1800) and in the United States Senate (1792–1794, 1803, 1822–1824). He wrote several books on politics and agriculture.

  2. 10 de abr. de 2024 · John Taylor (born December 19?, 1753, Caroline county, Virginia—died August 21, 1824, Caroline county, Virginia, U.S.) was one of the leading American philosophers of the liberal agrarian political movement—commonly known as Jeffersonian democracy—during the early national period.

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
  3. John Taylor of Caroline read law in the office of his uncle, edmund pendleton. He became involved early in Virginia revolutionary politics and was a delegate to the first continental congress. He served as an Army officer and almost continuously as a member of the House of Delegates (1779–1785).

  4. Há 2 dias · John Taylor of Caroline was a man of the American Revolution in whom the “Spirit of ’76” informed a conservative approach to understanding the powers of government.

  5. John Taylor (author) F Thornton Miller (editor) John Taylor of Caroline (1753-1824) was one of the foremost philosophers of the States’ rights Jeffersonians of the early national period. In keeping with his lifelong mission as a “minority man,” John Taylor wrote Tyranny Unmasked not only to assault the protective tariff and the ...

  6. 1753 – 1824. John Taylor, of Caroline County Virginia, was the preeminent theorist of Jeffersonian Old Republicanism. He was a strong advocate of individual and states rights in the face of the growing power of the federal government (“tyranny”) and opposed increased tariffs and mercantilist economic policy. Show more.

  7. The Political Economy of John Taylor of Caroline. DUNCAN MACLEOD. After years of comparative neglect John Taylor of Caroline has recently begun to receive again a degree of attention more in keeping with his true importance. That his impact upon both his own generation and upon sub. sequent generations of historians has always been less than it ...