Resultado da Busca
John Henry McDowell FBA (born 7 March 1942) is a South African philosopher, formerly a fellow of University College, Oxford, and now university professor at the University of Pittsburgh. Although he has written on metaphysics , epistemology , ancient philosophy , nature , and meta-ethics , McDowell's most influential work has been in ...
John Henry McDowell (Boksburg, 7 de março de 1942) é um filósofo sul-africano, ex-fellow do New College, Oxford e professor universitário da Universidade de Pittsburgh. Embora tenha escrito extensivamente sobre metafísica , epistemologia , filosofia antiga e metaética , a contribuição mais influente de McDowell foi no campo ...
Eurico Albino Gomes Martins Carvalho*. Em Mente e Mundo, John McDowell pretende fazer o diagnóstico de uma angús-tia filosófica fundamental, cujo centro gravítico, como se depreende do título da obra, radica, a seu ver, na relação que habitualmente se estabelece entre mente e mundo.
John McDowell is a leading expert on Greek philosophy, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, metaphysics and epistemology, and ethics. He is a fellow of the British Academy and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and has held visiting appointments at various esteemed institutions.
29 de set. de 2015 · A comprehensive overview of the life and work of John McDowell, a leading neo-Hegelian philosopher who has influenced many fields of philosophy. Learn about his approach to philosophy, his views on meaning, language, mind, and action, and his relation to other thinkers such as Wittgenstein, Sellars, and Brandom.
John Henry McDowell (Boksburg, 7 de março de 1942) é um filósofo sul-africano, ex-fellow do New College, Oxford e professor universitário da Universidade de Pittsburgh. Embora tenha escrito extensivamente sobre metafísica , epistemologia , filosofia antiga e metaética , a contribuição mais influente de McDowell foi no campo da filosofia ...
26 de jun. de 2023 · John McDowell is one of the most influential contemporary philosophers in a number of fields; but, the editors of Reason in Nature argue, the significance of his thought has been underestimated by many of his readers because they have not realised its unity.
