Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Henry_HallamHenry Hallam - Wikipedia

    Henry Hallam FRS FRSE FSA FRAS (9 July 1777 – 21 January 1859) was an English historian. Educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, he practised as a barrister on the Oxford circuit for some years before turning to history.

  2. Obras de história literária. Morte e memoriais. Bibliográfia. Referências. Henry Hallam ( 9 de julho de 1777 - 21 de janeiro de 1859) foi um historiador inglês. Educado em Eton and Christ Church, Oxford , ele atuou como advogado no circuito de Oxford por alguns anos antes de se dedicar à história.

    • Henry Hallam
  3. Although Henry Hallam (1777–1859) is best known for his Constitutional History of England (1827) and as a founder of ‘whig’ history, to situate him primarily as a mere critic of David Hume or as an apprentice to Thomas Babington Macaulay does him a disservice.

  4. Quick Reference. (1777–1859), historian, and the father of Arthur Hallam. His first published work was A View of the State of Europe during the Middle Ages (1818). His Constitutional History of England (1827) became a work of great and prolonged influence; it was continued by Sir T. E. May.

  5. HENRY HALLAM REVISITED MICHAEL BENTLEY University of St Andrews abstract. Although Henry Hallam (1777-1859) is best known for his Constitutional History of England (1827) and as a founder of 'whig' history, to situate him primarily as a mere critic of David Hume or as an apprentice to Thomas Babington Macaulay does him a disservice.

  6. www.historyhome.co.uk › people › hallamHenry Hallam (1777-1859)

    Henry Hallam (1777-1859) Henry Hallam, historian, was born at Windsor on 9 July 1777. He was the only son of John Hallam, canon of Windsor (1775-1812) and dean of Bristol (1781-1800), a man of high character, and well read in sacred and profane literature. The Hallams had long been settled at Boston in Lincolnshire, and one member of the family ...

  7. Although Henry Hallam ( – ) is best known for his Constitutional History of England ( ) and as a founder of ‘whig’ history, to situate him primarily as a mere critic of David Hume or as an apprentice to Thomas Babington Macaulay does him a disservice.