Resultado da Busca
2 de set. de 2022 · Moxfield has a better overall UI but Archidekt is dramatically better for viewing decks in visualized piles, which is how I prefer to sort/build. Moxfield cramps stacks too much IMO. Reply reply. Shoranos. •. Archidekt is an absolute nightmare to use on mobile in my experience, which is the main reason I don't use it.
Moxfield is good, particularly for sharing decks and primers as it does a better job of presenting decks, but I find the process of deck building to be a better experience on Archidekt, at least on desktop. They're very comparable in terms of features, I just prefer the builder UX of Archidekt. None of the others are worth mentioning.
27 de out. de 2021 · I'm a fan of moxfield for puttint my finished decks in to playtest them. Personally, I like deckstats because its very easy to make your own sections and they have lots of sorting options and their search engine works similarly to scryfall. Its very nice.
4 de abr. de 2024 · MTG Arena to Moxfield: First Make an MTGAPro Account. Download the tracker. Open Arena, Go over to setting, Click account, and enable Detailed Logs (Plugin Support) Once done with that make sure to open the tracker and sync your account on the website. after opening both Arena and the tracker app (Make sure its properly synced everything in the ...
3 de mai. de 2023 · Big new feature: Scryfall searching inside Moxfield collections! HUGE FEATURE ENHANCEMENT: We finally have Scryfall searching (and advanced searching) in our Collections. This was our number 1 requested feature and we’re so excited to get it in your hands. This update comes with a lot of other Collection features and there are so many small ...
Some tags are tailored to the specific deck. Generally though, my "global" tags are: counterspell, removal, boardwipe, card draw, card advantage, tutor, ramp, rocks, win-con 1, win-con 2, etc. Specific deck tags would be something like "haste enabler" or "treasure creator" for my [ [Ur-Dragon]] Reply reply.
2 de mai. de 2020 · AnIdealSociety. • 4 yr. ago. For viewing other peoples completed decks with primers I like moxfield better. For actually building a deck archidekt wins. I feel the search is better and the ability to drag and drop cards into premade and custom categories is essential when creating a deck. 29. Reply.
28 de out. de 2023 · I know I can make or import collection to Moxfield also to have this funcionality but I have no idea how to do it. Theres no option to export my collection from MTGA. I tried to use MtGArenaPro tracker, synced my collection and exported to CSV but the only avaiable format was MTGGoldfish CSV and its not supported by Moxfield.
Moxfield has a slightly better look and better performance, and their stats show a bit more info, but it's not enough for me to make the switch personally. If I'm sure a deck is as close I can get to optimized, I usually put it on Moxfield for the nicer look, but for actually building decks I still like Archidekt a lot more.
10 de nov. de 2023 · Unfortunately, Scryfall just doesn't have all of the double-sided tokens in their database, which is where Moxfield gets its data. They have some, which you can find here, but with so much product being added lately, I'm sure it is difficult for the Scryfall team to keep up. Thus, I'm guessing some of these things get pushed to the backburner.
