Resultado da Busca
The other is some legal contracts that have a section of definitions at the top where they carefully define "You" or "YOU" to refer to a specific category of person, like, "By 'You' we mean a person who has registered as a client of our company, who meets the requirements detailed in section 2.3.B, and whose membership is fully paid as of the ...
13 de jan. de 2014 · You'd has two meanings, which are you had and you would. 1 We use you had with better and you would with rather. You had is usually used for suggestion. Example: You'd better (you had better) avoid the stalls on the street. So you'd means you had in your first sentence. Your second sentence is grammatically wrong.
11 de abr. de 2019 · The normal form "how you would" is just this, "you would" is a conditional form: if X, then you would Y. "If there are any messages, this is how you would like to receive them." no question here, just an affirmation. The correct way to phrase your sentence is not one of the two you proposed. Here are the correct ways:
17 de set. de 2014 · Is it OK with you? would be asked in order to gain agreement from the other person that a proposal is acceptable, e.g. "Is it OK with you if we meet at 6 instead of 7?" Incidentally, the emphasis in the pronunciation is generally not the same for both. In the first the stress is usually on the "K" of "OK". In the second, the stress is on "you".
You would say "How are you?" when you don't know the person very well, or when you meet someone for the first time, whereas you would say "How are you doing?" when you already know someone, or act as if you already knew them. So "How are you doing?" is more warmful but it can be felt as a little too friendly in a formal context.
What about you? requests a statement about you in general, while How about you? requests a response about your manner, means, or condition. This leaves room for lots of personal preferences, presumptuous proscriptions, and zombie rules, to say nothing of actual sociocultural variation. – John Lawler.
11 de jan. de 2014 · 3.a) You would be that one. 3.b) You would be which one? 3.c) Which one would you be? Notice how the subject "you" ended up getting sandwiched between "would - be". A similar exercise can be done with the subject "Which one", except there is no subject-auxiliary verb inversion because the interrogative phrase is the subject: 4.a) That one would ...
18 de out. de 2012 · However, the above at usage is indifferent to whether you are indoors or outdoors. You could be on the street in front of your hotel or inside. You could be in your yard at home or in the bathroom at home. If you want to convey that you are indoors at a specific location, you would use in. I am in the Empire State Building. I am in my hotel. I ...
9. In your specific case, neither 'was' nor 'were' is best; you should say "if it is running". "If it were running" is subjunctive case, used to describe hypothetical situations: "If it were running, I would stop it first, but it's already stopped." "If it was running" is a common corruption of subjunctive case, or, as described in the other ...
6 de dez. de 2023 · You might tend to say this if the two didn't know each other. Thank you each for coming. It's much more idiomatic to say thank each of you for coming, and that means you're accounting for the possibility of any number of X. If you say this to two people there may be a faint implication there could or should be more than two.
