Resultado da Busca
Cadwalladr rose to international prominence in 2018 for her role in exposing the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal, for which she was a finalist for the 2019 Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, alongside The New York Times reporters.
19 de mai. de 2023 · The journalist lost her appeal against the Brexit campaigner over her remarks on his "covert relationship with the Russian government". She said it was a "dark day for press freedom" and called for reform of UK libel laws.
Carole Cadwalladr is a Guardian and Observer journalist who exposed Cambridge Analytica's role in Brexit and Facebook's threat to democracy. She won the Orwell Prize and was a Pulitzer finalist for her work.
13 de jun. de 2022 · The investigative journalist defeated the Brexit supporter in a five-day hearing over comments she made about his relationship with Russia. The High Court ruled that her statements were in the public interest and protected by the public interest defence.
- Charley Adams
- ‘Important Matter of Public Interest’
- ‘Negligible’ Evidence of Business Impact on Banks
- Judge Rules Cadwalladr Was Reliable Witness
- GeneratedCaptionsTabForHeroSec
Cadwalladr’s Ted Talk was based on years of reporting she had done for The Guardian and The Observer but Banks chose to sue only her. Press freedom organisations and advocates therefore described the case as a SLAPP (strategic litigation against public participation) designed to intimidate her out of reporting. Banks deniedit was a “vexatious” or “...
The judge said the public interest defence in the Defamation Act 2013had stopped applying once both the National Crime Agency published a statement in September 2019 finding no evidence of any criminal offences by Banks and the Electoral Commission accepted the findings of the NCA on 29 April 2020. But although Mrs Justice Steyn said the 2020 accep...
Cadwalladr fought the case only using the defence of public interest. She previously dropped the truth defenceafter a judge’s ruling on the meaning of the words in question in the case. Cadwalladr told Press Gazette in November 2020: “He has ruled that when I said Arron Banks lied about his relationship with the Russian government, it was ‘in relat...
The journalist used the public interest defence to defend her allegations of lies about Banks' relationship with the Russian government. The judge ruled that the Ted Talk and the tweet caused serious harm to Banks' reputation but were reasonable and true.
18 de mai. de 2023 · Reporters Without Borders (RSF) criticises the UK Court of Appeal for ordering the investigative journalist to pay £1m to Arron Banks, despite a public interest defence. The case is seen as a SLAPP and a threat to press freedom in the UK.
13 de jun. de 2022 · The High Court in London on Monday dismissed the case brought by Banks against journalist Carole Cadwalladr over a statement she made in a TED talk in April 2019 in which she referred to Banks’...
