Resultado da Busca
欧文·白璧德（Irving Babbitt）（1865—1933）， 美国文学 评论家，新 人文主义 思想的代表人物， 哈佛大学 比较文学 教授。 他认为西方自 文艺复兴 以来，过于强调“物的原则”而损害了人文艺术“人的原则”，主张应回到人的本源立场上来，崇尚人的道德想象和人文理性，反对 功利主义 的 审美观 。
Irving Babbitt. Irving Babbitt (1865 – 1933) fue un académico estadounidense y crítico literario, notable por haber fundado un movimiento conocido como el Nuevo Humanismo, con una influencia significativa en la discusión literaria y el pensamiento conservador en el período que va desde 1910 hasta 1930. Fue un crítico de la cultura en la ...
1 de fev. de 2024 · It evokes instead Kant’s motto for the Enlightenment: Have courage to use your own understanding. The admonition is against uncritical trust in preceding authority. “In direct ratio,” according to Babbitt, “to the completeness of one’s break with the past must be the keenness of one’s discrimination.”.
9 de jan. de 2019 · Irving Babbitt’s History of Ideas and the Making of “Men of Quality”. In 1908, the humanities were in peril, as they so often seem to be. That year Irving Babbitt, a professor of French literature at Harvard, published a collection of essays he had written over the previous two decades decrying the decline of the American college and the ...
24 de out. de 2017 · Irving Babbitt was a giant of American criticism. His writings from the 1890s to the 1930s helped advance American criticism and scholarship to international esteem. More than seventy years after his death his intellectual staying power remains undiminished.
Irving Babbitt was a giant of American criticism. His writings from the 1890s to the 1930s helped advance American criticism and scholarship to international esteem. More than seventy years after his death his intellectual staying power remains undiminished. On Literature, Culture, and Religion is an ideal introduction to this seminal American thinker.Babbitt's opinions were uncompromising ...
5 de dez. de 2011 · The Achievement of Irving Babbitt. Dec 5, 2011. T o define Irving Babbitt’s central view of life, from which radiate all his other views—of letters, of education, of society—I commence by quoting not his own words, but those of a different writer—one whom he would not have approved. For in reading Bertrand Russell’s recent ...
