Resultado da Busca
3 de dez. de 2020 · 22 E.g. Gregory Conti, ‘James Fitzjames Stephen and the Landscape of Victorian Political Thought’, Modern Intellectual History, forthcoming.It should be observed here that, while Stephen certainly maintained a healthy sense of the distinctiveness of the English and a sense of the importance of differing national characters in keeping with mid-nineteenth-century social-scientific ...
James Fitzjames Stephen (1829-94) is chiefly known as John Stuart Mill's most scathing critic. Author of Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (1873), Stephen savaged all the ascendant doctrines of the midnineteenth century which seemed to have crystallized in Mill's later writings. Yet Stephen's legacy was not purely negative and destructive. In particular, he passionately defended the cause of a non ...
5 de mar. de 2021 · The jurist Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (1829–94) published this work in 1863 to provide the intelligent layman with a general account of the workings and principles of English criminal law. He begins with a brief sketch of the development of that law from the Anglo-Saxon period onwards.
He was the fourth of five children, his siblings including James Fitzjames Stephen (1829–1894) and Caroline Emelia Stephen (1834–1909). [citation needed] His family had belonged to the Clapham Sect, the early 19th century group of mainly evangelical Christian social reformers.
Descrição. James Fitzjames Stephens argues against the philosophical and social views advanced by John Stuart Mill: for the author, Mills ideas of equality, utilitarianism and freedom were anathema.The attitudes expressed by Stephens were unpopular at the time of publication: his arguments against the notions of democracy and freedom are rooted in traditionalism, in a time of great - and ...
16 de ago. de 2019 · James Fitzjames Stephen was a man of a type instantly recognizable and now wholly disappeared, the Englishman confident in English superiority. He was a lawyer, then judge, with a sideline in journalism, consisting mostly of political analyses masquerading as book reviews (a terrible practice, as everybody knows).
29 de mai. de 2014 · Abstract. Sir James Fitzjames Stephen’s Indian Evidence Act of 1872 was a revolutionary piece of work with respect to its conceptualisation of relevance and admissibility – essentially, it simplified the common law framework and statutorily defined what was relevant and admissible and obviated the need to ask what was not relevant or what was not admissible.
