Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Critique of Dialectical Reason (French: Critique de la raison dialectique) is a 1960 book by the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, in which the author further develops the existentialist Marxism he first expounded in his essay Search for a Method (1957).

    • Jean Paul Sartre, Arlette Elkaïm-Sartre, Quintin Hoare
    • 835 (English ed., vol. 1), 467 (English ed., vol. 2)
    • 1960
    • 1960 (vol. 1), 1985 (vol. 2)
  2. 19 de set. de 2022 · Abstract. Jean-Paul Sartre’s enormous and often difficult Critique of Dialectical Reason (1960/2004) has largely been forgotten today. But the concepts it contains are worth reconsidering, particularly from an organization theory perspective.

  3. Critique of Dialectical Reason. Jean-Paul Sartre. 1960. The Fused Group. The group — the equivalence of freedom as necessity and of. necessity as freedom — the scope and limits of any realist dialectic. 1 The Genesis of Groups. As we have seen, the necessity of the group is not present a priori in a gathering.

  4. from Critique of Dialectical Reason. Jean-Paul Sartre. 1960. Critique of Critical Investigation 1 The Basis of Critical Investigation. We know the abstract conditions which this investigation must satisfy if it is to be possible. But these conditions leave its individual reality undetermined.

  5. 9 de nov. de 2021 · Sartre’s late work – the Critique of Dialectical Reason – attempted to develop a new theory of praxis emphasizing themes that anticipate new materialist and biopolitical turns in the humanities.

    • Daniel Sullivan
    • 2021
  6. The Critique of Dialectical Reason; Joseph S. Catalano, Kean University, New Jersey; Book: Reading Sartre; Online publication: 05 June 2012; Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779497.005

  7. Jean-Paul Sartre, Critique of Dialectical Reason. Translated by Alan Sheridan-Smith, edited by Jonathan Ree. London: New Left Books, 1976. Of Sartre's major theoretical works, none is more problematic than. the Critique. It stands in apparent contradiction to his earlier writings;