Resultado da Busca
Finkelman situates this infamous holding within a solid record of support for slavery and hostility to free blacks.Supreme Injustice boldly documents the entanglements that alienated three major justices from America’s founding ideals and embedded racism ever deeper in American civic life.
91. 5.4K views Streamed 6 years ago. Legal historian Paul Finkelman discusses his book Supreme Injustice, which highlights the three most important Supreme Court Justices before the Civil...
- 71 min
- 5,6K
- US National Archives
8 de jan. de 2018 · In Supreme Injustice, the distinguished legal historian Paul Finkelman establishes an authoritative account of each justice’s proslavery position, the reasoning behind his opposition to black...
Finkelman situates this infamous holding within a solid record of support for slavery and hostility to free Blacks. Supreme Injustice boldly documents the entanglements that alienated three major justices from America’s founding ideals and embedded racism ever deeper in American civic life.
Paul Finkelman. Harvard University Press, Jan 8, 2018 - Law - 287 pages. The three most important Supreme Court Justices before the Civil War--Chief Justices John Marshall and Roger B. Taney and...
- 265
- 269
- 219
- 227
3 de dez. de 2018 · [Supreme Injustice] tells the story of three United States Supreme Court Justices…and their ‘slavery jurisprudence.’ Each of these men, Finkelman argues…shared the belief that antislavery agitation undermined the legal and political structures instituted by the Constitution…
9 de jan. de 2003 · Supreme Injustice: How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000. Alan M. Dershowitz. Published: 9 January 2003. Cite. Permissions. Share. Abstract. Millions of Americans were mystified by, and outraged, by the US Supreme Court's role in deciding the presidential election of 2000.
