Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Há 3 dias · In essence, there is a serious lack of any sustained and rigorous treatment of ontology that underpins much of the current debate about replication and Popper’s falsificationist approach. The overriding problem is that the replication debate reflects the methodologist tendency for mainstream psychologists to avoid or gloss over crucial ontological questions.

  2. Há 4 dias · Análise Crítica da Teoria de Popper. Diversos estudiosos destacaram que, embora a falsificabilidade seja um critério importante, existem limitações na aplicação do falsificacionismo a todas as disciplinas científicas. A complexidade da prática científica levanta questões sobre a universalidade desse método.

  3. Há 1 dia · Are Plato and Marx Enemies of Democracy? Diving into Karl Popper's CritiqueVideo Description:Explore the critical insights of Karl Popper, one of the 20th ce...

    • 5 min
    • 5
    • Political Affairs
  4. Há 2 dias · Karl Popper (1902-1994) fue un filósofo austríaco-británico, considerado uno de los pensadores más importantes e influyentes de la filosofía del siglo XX. Hizo grandes aportes a la filosofía natural y a la de las ciencias sociales.

    • (56)
  5. Há 4 dias · Updated: May 27th, 2024. The nature of science is a complete matter that many individuals have attempted to explain. One such person was Karl Popper, a philosopher of science who proposed a way to demarcate science and pseudoscience (Mitra, 2020). When studying at the University of Vienna, Popper examined Freudian and Marxian ...

  6. Há 2 dias · Recomendações aos cientistas, Karl Popper: Extratos (adaptados) de Ciência: problemas, objetivos e responsabilidades (Popper falando a biólogos, em 1963, em plena Guerra Fria): "A tarefa mais importante de um cientista é certamente contribuir para o avanço de sua área de conhecimento.

  7. Há 14 horas · Popper (1969) claimed that science progressed from us learning from our mistakes – conjectures are tentative solutions to our problems which are controlled by criticisms, or refutations. Even though this may seem enticing, my personal inclination lies in recognizing the tumultuous roots of scientific discovery, which is reflected by the forthcoming philosopher.