Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. 12 de dez. de 2020 · 835 pages ; 22 cm Critique of Dialectical Reason is the product of a later stage in Sartre's thinking, during which he no longer identified Marxism with the Soviet Union or French Communism but came closer to identifying as a Marxist.

  2. 17 de jan. de 1984 · Born in Paris in 1905 and died in 1980, Sartre was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1964—and turned it down. His books include Nausea, Intimacy, The Flies, No Exit, Sartre’s War Diaries, Critique of Dialectical Reason, and the monumental treatise Being and Nothingness.

    • Jean-Paul Sartre
  3. Seeking to give Marxism what Michael McGee called "a more rigorous intellectual defense," Sartre wrote volume one of Critique of Dialectical Reason (CDR) between 1957 & 1960; it was published in France in 1960. The first English edition appeared in 1976. A second, unfinished volume appeared posthumously in 1982.

    • Jean-Paul Sartre
  4. Critique of Dialectical Reason. Jean-Paul Sartre, 1960. Collectives. Social objects (by which I mean any objects which have a collective structure and which, as such, must be the subject matter of sociology) are, at least in their fundamental structure, beings of the practico-inert field.

  5. 17 de jul. de 2006 · Born in Paris in 1905 and died in 1980, Sartre was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1964—and turned it down. His books include Nausea, Intimacy, The Flies, No Exit, Sartre’s War Diaries, Critique of Dialectical Reason, and the monumental treatise Being and Nothingness.

    • Jean-Paul Sartre
  6. Mbembe’s Critique of Black Reason, far from a rejection of Black thought, was intended to analyze its vicissi-tudes and think a unified thought. Regardless of what we might think of the efficacy of the above projects the meaning of “critique” is clear. Naming my own project a Critique of Maoist Reason, then, is somewhat tongue-and-cheek: I am

  7. Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason ranks with Being and Nothingness as a work of major philosophical significance, but it has been largely neglected. The first volume, published in 1960, was dismissed as a Marxist work at a time when structuralism was coming into vogue; the incomplete second volume has only recently been published in France. In this commentary on the first volume ...