Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Deterrence in an international relations context is the application of deterrence theory to avoid conflict. Deterrence is widely defined as any use of threats (implicit or explicit) or limited force intended to dissuade an actor from taking an action (i.e. maintain the status quo).

  2. There are two main goals of deterrence theory. Individual deterrence is the aim of punishment to discourage the offender from criminal acts in the future. The belief is that when punished, offenders recognise the unpleasant consequences of their actions on themselves and will change their behaviour accordingly.

  3. A Destruição Mútua Assegurada é uma forma desta estratégia, utilizada para caracterizar as relações entre os Estados Unidos e a União Soviética . A intimidação por proibição é uma estratégia onde um governo constrói ou mantém sistemas de defesa e inteligência com o propósito de neutralizar ou coibir ataques.

  4. Deterrence Theory: Key Findings and Challenges. Alex Raskolnikov. Abstract: This chapter reviews the key findings of the optimal deterrence theory and discusses the remaining challenges. Some of these challenges reflect current modeling choices and limitations.

  5. Abstract. This chapter reviews the classic literature on deterrence theory. Scholars have examined many varieties of deterrenceextended, immediate, general, denial, punishment, etc.—and have applied them to many different areas—nuclear and conventional warfare, cyber and space operations, terrorism and insurgency, economic statecraft ...

  6. The Concept of Deterrence and Deterrence Theory. Patrick M. Morgan. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.572. Published online: 27 July 2017. Summary. Deterrence is an old practice, readily defined and described, widely employed but unevenly effective and of questionable reliability.

  7. Deterrence is the practice of discouraging or restraining someone— in world politics, usually a nation-state—from taking unwanted actions, such as an armed attack. It involves an efort to stop or prevent an action, as opposed to the closely related but distinct concept of “compellence,” which is an efort to force an actor to do something.