Resultado da Busca
The End of the World Is Just the Beginning: Mapping the Collapse of Globalization is a nonfiction book written by Peter Zeihan, a geopolitical strategist who formerly worked for the geopolitical intelligence firm Stratfor. The book was published by Harper Business in June 2022. Summary.
Overview. In the 2022 nonfiction work The End of the World Is Just the Beginning: Mapping the Collapse of Globalization, Peter Zeihan argues that the world is in transition from globalization to de-globalization, which benefits the US but has dire consequences for most countries.
In The End of the World is Just the Beginning, author and geopolitical strategist Peter Zeihan maps out the next world: a world where countries or regions will have no choice but to make their own goods, grow their own food, secure their own energy, fight their own battles, and do it all with populations that are both shrinking and aging.
- (4)
8 de ago. de 2022 · The End of the World is Just the Beginning is the fourth instalment from geopolitical strategist, Peter Zeihan. The book lays out his thesis that the US sponsored Bretton Woods world order (“the Order” for short) is going to collapse.
For those wondering about the planet’s future – and who isn’t, these days – geostrategist Peter Zeihan provides a detailed but somber prognosis for the global economy. The abundance of global trade since World War II is about to give way to a poorer, “deglobalized” world, Zeihan believes.
10 de jun. de 2022 · Epically scoped, confidently argued, dizzyingly digressional, The End of The World Is Just the Beginning is an apocalyptic outline given by a smirking prophet who – it must be added – does not seem at all as worried as he wants the rest of us to be.
14 de jun. de 2022 · Are countries really going to develop their own pirate fleets to seize supply ships? Will the U.S. establish a quasi-empire of the Americas, using food as a weapon of intimidation? Is China facing collapse within a decade? Predictions of world-ending resource depletion and geopolitical disaster have been made before—and often.
