Resultado da Busca
Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law, according to which racial segregation did not necessarily violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which nominally guaranteed "equal protection" under the law to all people.
Há 1 dia · Learn about the legal doctrine that allowed racial segregation in the U.S. until 1954, and how it was challenged and overturned by the Supreme Court. Explore the legacy and impact of "separate but equal" on social and economic inequalities.
Separate but equal (em português: "Separado mas igual") foi uma doutrina jurídica da lei constitucional dos Estados Unidos que justificava e permitia segregação racial naquele país como não sendo uma violação da décima-quarta emenda da constituição estadunidense que garantia proteção e direitos civis iguais a todos os ...
29 de out. de 2009 · Learn about the 1896 Supreme Court case that upheld racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. Find out how the case challenged the constitutional rights of Black people and paved the way for Jim Crow laws.
“Separado, mas igual” era a doutrina jurídica que fundamentava a constitucionalidade das leis segregatícias norte-americanas. A doutrina tinha uma força jurídica tão expressiva que o judiciário norte-americano entendia que ela não violava a 14ª emenda à constituição norte-americana.
17 de jun. de 2024 · Plessy v. Ferguson, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on May 18, 1896, by a seven-to-one majority (one justice did not participate), advanced the controversial ‘separate but equal’ doctrine for assessing the constitutionality of racial segregation laws.
Learn about the infamous Supreme Court decision in 1896 that allowed racial segregation laws in the United States. Find out the background, the case, the holding, and the aftermath of the "separate but equal" doctrine that was overruled by Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.
