Resultado da Busca
17 de mai. de 2024 · Richard Wellesley: 18 May 1798 – 30 July 1805: Nizam of Hyderabad becomes first State to sign Subsidiary alliance introduced by Wellesley (1798). Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1798–99) Second Pazhassi Revolt in Malabar (1800–05)
- 1,940,000 km² (750,000 sq mi)
- Early modern
- Calcutta (1773–1858)
- British colony
30 de abr. de 2024 · The Doctrine of Subsidiary Alliance was first introduced by Lord Wellesley, the Governor-General of India, after the Battle of Buxar in 1765. This marked the initial stage of its implementation, establishing the foundation for the subsequent expansion of British control.
15 de mai. de 2024 · Lord Wellesley was appointed as Governor-General: 1798 CE: Introduction of Subsidiary Alliance : 1799 CE: Fourth Anglo-Mysore war: 1802 CE: Treaty of Bassein: 1803 to 1805 CE: Second Anglo-Maratha war: 1806 to 1837 CE: Reign of Akbar II: 1807 to 1813 CE: Lord Minto served as the Governor-General: 1813 CE: The Charter Act of 1813 was passed ...
8 de mai. de 2024 · Lord Wellesley, serving as Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805, implemented several significant reforms and policies that had a profound impact on British India. Subsidiary Alliance System: Lord Wellesley is best known for introducing the Subsidiary Alliance System, a diplomatic and military strategy aimed at expanding ...
Há 6 dias · Complete answer: Lord Wellesley planned the subsidiary alliance in which Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces as they were to be protected by the company.
Há 4 dias · Subsidiary Alliance. In 1798, Lord Wellesley introduced the Subsidiary Alliance system in India, under which the ruler of the allying Indian state was compelled to pay a subsidy for the maintenance of British army in return for getting protection from the British against their enemies.
12 de mai. de 2024 · (ii) Subsidiary Alliance: Introduced by Lord Wellesley, the Subsidiary Alliance was a crafty strategy. Under this system, Indian rulers were not allowed to have their independent armed forces. Instead, they were to be provided with Company troops, which they had to pay for.
