Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. 30 de abr. de 2024 · He was popularly, although probably unjustly, held responsible for England’s defeats in the late stages of the Hundred Years’ War (1337–1453) against France. William was the second son of Michael de la Pole, 2nd earl of Suffolk.

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
  2. 19 de mai. de 2024 · It next passed into the hands of Michael de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk, whose descendant, Edmund de la Pole, lost it by attainder of High Treason, in the reign of Henry VIII., when it was regranted by that monarch to Edmund Jernegan, Esq., and Mary his wife, and subsequently passed, as the Hundred of Mutford, through the families of ...

  3. 3 de mai. de 2024 · The 34-year-old is reportedly a descendant of the De La Pole family, who once lorded over Suffolk. Her ancestry can be traced back to Michael De La Pole, 2nd Earl of Suffolk....

  4. 16 de mai. de 2024 · Michael de la Pole 2nd Earl of Suffolk was killed at the Siege of Harfleur in 1415. He was succeeded by his eldest son, Michael 3rd Earl of Suffolk. The 3rd Earl’s life also ended during the 1415 Campaigns in France, he died in the Battle of Agincourt .

  5. 9 de mai. de 2024 · Their family connection dates back to aristocratic England in the 14th century, with their common ancestors being Michael de la Pole, second Earl of Suffolk, and his wife Katherine Stafford. Michael de la Pole was an English nobleman who supported Henry IV against Richard II during the late 14th century.

  6. Há 6 dias · The De La Pole family continued to lay claim to the throne; Edmund de la Pole, 3rd Duke of Suffolk, brother of the executed Earl of Lincoln, was executed in 1513 by Henry VIII for this claim, while his brother Richard, known as the White Rose and who had conspired to invade England to claim the throne, was killed in battle at Pavia ...

  7. Há 3 dias · MICHAEL DE LA POLE SON OF THE EARL OF SUFFOLK: Writ 6 Dec. 1415. SOMERSET. Inquisition. West Coker. 27 Dec. He held the advowson of Norton sub Hamdon, which the earl of Suffolk had held of the king in chief by knight service, annual value 20 marks. It was taken into the king’s hands owing to his minority.