Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Há 2 dias · Husserl’s major revisions to his phenomenology of the drive itself are executed on the basis of his new insight, that a drive is composed of two moments; the drive-impulse and the drive-movement. By investigating Husserl’s new descriptions of these two moments, (part of) the complex relationship between Husserl’s early observations and his mature phenomenology of drives can be sketched.

  2. 3 de jun. de 2024 · Here, Husserl places his analysis at the level of passive accomplishments, more specifically, of accomplishments of primary passivity, thus the different articulating processes of sense data and egoic responses that underlie active egoic accomplishments.

  3. 7 de jun. de 2024 · Husserl rejects these metaphysical “realisms” by crafting his brand of phenomenology in the shape of a transcendental idealism that recasts and combines elements of transcendental criticism with positivist phenomenology and intentionalist psychology.

  4. Há 6 dias · In short, phenomenology can be understood as a loosely bound together philosophical and intellectual movement, initiated at the beginning of the 20th century and, in its modern sense, based around Edmund Husserl's philosophical ideas as well as the critical reception of these ideas by his many students, followers, and critics.

  5. 15 de jun. de 2024 · Arguing that transcendental consciousness sets the limits of all possible knowledge, Husserl redefined phenomenology as a transcendental-idealist philosophy. Husserl's thought profoundly influenced 20th-century philosophy, and he remains a notable figure in contemporary philosophy and beyond.

  6. 31 de mai. de 2024 · The tensions between Edmund Husserl and his critics reveal a deep and enduring dialogue within philosophy. Husserl’s phenomenology, with its introspective and essentialist approach, stands in stark contrast to the empirical, linguistic, pragmatic, and naturalistic tendencies of his critics.

  7. 15 de jun. de 2024 · Since its formulation by Edmund Husserl, phenomenology has been regarded as a ‘method’. This is contested by Michel Henry, who speaks of the ‘question’ of phenomenology. This article traces Henry's objection to the classification of phenomenology as method, and considers both what he means by phenomenology being a question and what the answer to this question would be.