Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. 20 de mai. de 2024 · Judge G. Steven Agee, a George W. Bush appointee, claimed that the parents seeking to opt their children out of the lessons in question did not provide sufficient evidence to justify a preliminary injunction. In March of last year, MCPS added nearly two dozen “LGBTQ+ inclusive texts” to the pre-K through 8th grade curriculum.

  2. 17 de mai. de 2024 · Judge G. Steven Agee, a George W. Bush appointee, claimed that the parents seeking to opt their children out of the lessons in question did not provide sufficient evidence to justify a preliminary injunction. In March of last year, MCPS added nearly two dozen “LGBTQ+ inclusive texts” to the pre-K through 8th grade curriculum.

  3. 16 de mai. de 2024 · In a baffling opinion, Judge G. Steven Agee, a Bush nominee, incredibly claimed there was insufficient evidence that the LGBTQ storybooks like “Pride Puppy!” and “Born Ready” would actually burden the families’ sincere religious beliefs about marriage and gender.

  4. 20 de mai. de 2024 · The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided on Wednesday that Montgomery County Public Schools in Maryland does not have to allow parents to opt their children out of LGBTQ-themed lessons. Judge G. Steven Agee, a George W. Bush appointee, claimed that the parents seeking to opt their children out of the lessons in question did not provide ...

  5. 17 de mai. de 2024 · Judge G. Steven Agee, a President George W. Bush appointee, wrote the majority opinion stating that parents did not present enough evidence to show that the policy violates the free exercise of their religion and their due process right to direct their children’s education. Agee wrote:

  6. 15 de mai. de 2024 · A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that parents in Montgomery County, Maryland, can't remove their elementary school-age children from classes that include books on human sexuality and gender.

  7. 22 de mai. de 2024 · Judge G. Steven Agee’s decision, which dismissed the parents’ claims for “lack of evidence,” is spellbinding in its disregard for religious liberty. The federal lawsuit, brought forth by a coalition of Christian and Muslim parents, sought to protect their children from being force-fed a curriculum that promotes ideas fundamentally opposed to their faith.