Resultado da Busca
View PDF. Du conservatisme libéral d’Oakeshott Note de lecture Michael Oakeshott, Du conservatisme, trad. J.-F. Séné, préf. d’A. Guillemin, Paris, éd. du Félin, 2011, 120 pages ÉLÉNA CHOQUETTE Aux éditions du Félin, est parue en 2011 la toute première traduction du bien connu « On Being Conservative » (1956) de Michael Oakeshott1.
8 de mar. de 2016 · Michael Oakeshott (1901–1990) is often called a conservative thinker. But this label identifies only one aspect of his thought and invites misunderstanding because it is ambiguous. His ideas spring from a lifetime of reading in the literature of European thought, sharpened by philosophical reflection on its arguments and presuppositions.
connect Oakeshott with the main traditions of thought, then analyse the theoretical implications of his position, and fi nally explore the consequences derived from all this for everyday political practice. Cómo citar Baqués, Josep (2014). «La obra de Michael Oakeshott como paradigma del liberalismo conservador».
27 de fev. de 2009 · Abstract. Michael Oakeshott, one of the most important political thinkers in the second half of the twentieth century, has been understood to be a skeptical conservative, a romantic, a liberal individualist, an historian of political thought, a philosopher, a charismatic teacher. Each of these characterizations conveys something to be found in ...
Houghton Street, Aldwich London, W.C.2. January 31st, 1948. Dear Oakeshott, I was extremely pleased to get your long letter, and I am very grateful for your response to my little paper (which I wrote about eight months ago; it was the address to a philosophical conference in Brussels, mainly attended by communists).
23 de mai. de 2024 · Michael Oakeshott (1901–1990) was one of the leading British philosophers of the twentieth century. He has been influential particularly as a political philosopher, but his work reflects a range of philosophical interests that have more gradually come to be appreciated.
21 de dez. de 2015 · This is the first comprehensive study of Michael Oakeshott as a philosopher rather than a political theorist, which is how most commentators have regarded him. Indeed, the careful reading of his published and unpublished writings that Terry Nardin provides here shows that Oakeshott's concerns have been primarily philosophical, not political. These writings go far beyond politics to offer a ...
