Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. William de la Pole: Merchant and King's Banker: Merchant and King's Banker (1366), Part 1366 Volume 1 of History original Volume 28 of History series Volume 28 of SPSDS occasional paper: History series: Author: E. B. Fryde: Publisher: Bloomsbury Academic, 1988: Original from: the University of California: Digitized: Jun 5, 2008: ISBN ...

  2. POLE, WILLIAM de la, fourth Earl and first Duke of Suffolk (1396–1450), second son of Michael de la Pole, second earl [q. v.], was born on 16 Oct. 1396 at Cotton in Suffolk (Napier, pp. 47, 64–5). He served in the French campaign of 1415, but was invalided home after the siege of Harfleur (ib. p. 48).

  3. 10 de dez. de 2016 · Rightly or wrongly, William de la Pole, 1st Duke of Suffolk was blamed for the loss of English territory in France, fiscal mismanagement, civil unrest and the general overall troubles of the reign of King Henry VI of England. He was arraigned on many charges and put in the Tower. Parliament was at the ready….

  4. Willaim de la Pole, 1st Duke of Suffolk. Born: October 16, 1396. Cotton, Suffolk, England. Died: May 2, 1450 (Age 53) Suffolk in History. Little is known of the early life of William de la Pole, but considering he was merely a second son of an earl, it is safe to say his fortunes were not particularly promising. 1415, however, would prove to be ...

  5. William de la Pole 1st Duke of Suffolk (1396 - 1450) RA Collection: People and Organisations Profile. Born: 1396 Died: 2 May 1450

  6. Duke of Suffolk William De La Pole. Childhood. William De La Pole was born in October 1396, the son of Michael de la Pole, the 2 nd Earl of Suffolk and Katherine De Stafford. It was his elder brother Michael, who inherited the title of 3 rd Earl of Suffolk when his father died of dysentery at Harfleur, whilst supporting King Henry V.

  7. THE DEATH OF WILLIAM DE LA POLE 491 All these sources were known to the chief modern historians who have discussed the murder of Suffolk in any detail, C. L. Kingsford and J. H. Ramsay, and more recent writers on the fifteenth century have been generally content to take the outline