Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Frege's puzzles are puzzles about the semantics of proper names, although related puzzles also arise in the case of indexicals. Gottlob Frege (1848–1925) introduced the puzzle at the beginning of his article "Über Sinn und Bedeutung" ("On Sense and Reference") in 1892 in one of the most influential articles in analytic philosophy ...

  2. 16 de mar. de 2015 · An explication of Gottlob Frege's puzzle for the principle of the transitivity of identity also known as the principle of identity substitution.Information f...

    • 3 min
    • 20,3K
    • Carneades.org
  3. 11 de dez. de 2023 · These scenarios all raise a puzzle that is pivotal to our understanding of meaning and thought—two central notions in the philosophy of language and mind. It is called Frege’s puzzle, after the philosopher and mathematician Gottlob Frege (1848-1925).

  4. 14 de set. de 1995 · Frege is generally credited with identifying the following puzzle about propositional attitude reports, even though he didn’t quite describe the puzzle in the terms used below. A propositional attitude is a psychological relation between a person and a proposition.

  5. 16 de fev. de 2000 · In this article, we examine attempts to deal with a puzzle about propositional attitude reporting sentences that was first posed by Gottlob Frege in his 1892. Subsequent literature has been concerned with developing a semantic theory that offers an adequate treatment of this puzzle.

    • Thomas McKay, Michael Nelson
    • 2000
  6. Since Frege replies to Thomae by citing the distinction between sense and reference, it might seem that Frege is using that distinction to defend the object view. But Frege asserts neither the object view nor the name view in his reply to Thomae.

  7. fundamenta uma das mais famosas formulações do problema da identidade: o Frege¶s Puzzle. Em seu texto Sobre o Sentido e a Referência Gottlob Frege apresenta o problema da identidade, afirmando que sentenças de identidade das diferentes formas “a = a” e “a = b”, apesar de