Resultado da Busca
Frank Raymond " F. R. " Leavis CH (14 July 1895 – 14 April 1978) was an English literary critic of the early-to-mid-twentieth century. He taught for much of his career at Downing College, Cambridge, and later at the University of York . Leavis ranked among the most prominent English-language critics in the 1950s and 1960s. [1] . J. B.
10 de abr. de 2024 · F.R. Leavis (born July 14, 1895, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, Eng.—died April 14, 1978, Cambridge) was an English literary critic who championed seriousness and moral depth in literature and criticized what he considered the amateur belletrism of his time.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
26 de jul. de 2017 · A comprehensive overview of the life and work of F. R. Leavis, a influential 20th-century British critic and teacher. Learn about his tradition, theory, language, poetry, fiction, and education, as well as his controversies and legacy.
27 de fev. de 2020 · F. R. Leavis (1895–1978) was an English literary critic and university teacher and a major figure on the English-speaking cultural landscape during the middle decades of the twentieth century. He was particularly associated with the rise of Cambridge ‘English’.
- Steven Cranfield
- Steven.Cranfield@lshtm.ac.uk
- 2020
LEAVISIANISMO. Em Inglaterra, a revista de crítica literária Scrutinity, lançada em 1932 por F. R. Leavis (1895-1978) e sua esposa, legitimou e privilegiou um determinado método de análise do texto literário ( close reading) que viria a ser conhecido por leavisianismo.
10 de nov. de 2015 · This chapter gives an overview of Leavis’s life and work, his intellectual heritage and legacy. The first part of the life takes us up to the completion of Leavis’s doctoral studies, with an intervening period of nearly four years’ service in the...
F. R. Leavis was one of the most potent single influences on English studies in the earlier and middle part of the twentieth century. He is best known for his radical revaluation of the accepted canon of English literature, and his impact lies in the revaluative activity itself as much as in the particular set of judgements it involved.
