2010
Resultado da Busca
Em defesa de um novo paradigma: a probabilidade e o standard de prova para condenação no processo penal (standard beyond a reasonable doubt — além da dúvida razoável), no prelo.
10 de jul. de 2009 · A 2009 remake of a 1956 film noir about a journalist who frames himself for murder to expose a corrupt DA. IMDb provides cast and crew, plot summary, trivia, goofs, quotes, soundtracks and user and critic reviews.
- (14K)
- Crime, Drama, Mystery
- Peter Hyams
- 2009-07-10
Learn the meaning and application of the legal burden of proof required to convict a defendant in a criminal case. Find out how it differs from the civil standard of preponderance of the evidence and see related terms and cases.
- Definitions
- History of The Standard of Reasonable Doubt
- The Burden of Proof
- Reasonable Doubt in Practice
- Related Legal Terms and Issues
- GeneratedCaptionsTabForHeroSec
Doubt
1. A feeling of uncertainty about the truth, the reality of a situation or presented facts, or nature of something 2. To be uncertain about a thing; to be undecided in a belief or opinion Origin 1175-1225 Old French douter
Reasonable
1. Acceptable to sound reason or judgment, logical Origin 1250-1300 Middle English resonable
The Western standard by which accused people are judged originated in medieval England, which held jurors to a strict religious standard in passing judgment. Prior to the “reasonable doubt” concept, passing judgment on an individual in a criminal trial exposed jury members to the edict that, whoever found another person guilty, was subject to the “...
The burden of proof is a requirement for one party in a trial to provide evidence that shifts the opinion and conclusion away from the opposing party’s position to one’s own position. How convincing the evidence needs to be to accomplish this in a court of law varies according to the type of trial. While the burden of proof necessary to convict a p...
In a 1995 trial that lasted nine months, former football player O.J. Simpson was accused of the brutal murder of his ex-wife, Nichole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman. The prosecution presented both lay and expert witnesses, as well as a mountain of evidence over the course of six months in an attempt to prove to the jury that Simpson c...
Preponderance– a superiority in importance, strength, power, or weight.Acquit – to relieve someone from a criminal charge; to declare not guiltyWrongful Death– the death of an individual caused by the willful or negligent actions of another person.Learn what beyond a reasonable doubt means in the U.S. criminal legal system and how it differs from other standards of proof. See how this concept was applied in the O.J. Simpson trial and other cases.
Acima de Qualquer Suspeita é um filme dirigido por Peter Hyams com Michael Douglas, Jesse Metcalfe. Sinopse: C.J. Nichols (Jesse Metcalfe) é um jornalista investigativo disposto a denunciar o ...
- (65)
- 30 de abril de 2022
- Peter Hyams
- 105
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt (prt: A Verdade e o Medo [1]; bra: Acima de Qualquer Suspeita [2]) é um filme estadunidense de 2009, do gênero suspense, escrito e dirigido por Peter Hyams. [2] Trata-se de um remake do filme homônimo que Fritz Lang dirigiu em 1956.
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt is a 2009 American crime thriller film written and directed by Peter Hyams, starring Michael Douglas, Jesse Metcalfe and Amber Tamblyn. Based on Fritz Lang's 1956 film of the same name, it was Hyams' second reimagining of an RKO property after 1990's Narrow Margin.
