Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values is a 2010 book by Sam Harris, in which he promotes a science of morality and argues that many thinkers have long confused the relationship between morality, facts, and science.

    • Sam Harris
    • 2010
  2. 13 de set. de 2011 · Along with gene expression and activity in certain brain regions, The Moral Landscape enlightens you on how even evolution plays in determining moral values. Harris posits that we are not evolutionarily adapted for our society - we are not selected to become better government officials or shopkeepers.

    • Sam Harris
    • $10.99
    • Free Press
  3. 5 de out. de 2010 · The Moral Landscape. : Sam Harris. Simon and Schuster, Oct 5, 2010 - Science - 322 pages. New York Times Bestseller: “Makes a powerful case for a morality that is based on human flourishing...

    • unabridged
    • Sam Harris
    • Simon and Schuster, 2010
  4. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values (em português: A Paisagem Moral: Como a Ciência Pode Determinar os Valores Humanos) é um livro do autor estadunidense Sam Harris. No livro, o autor promove uma ciência da moralidade e argumenta que muitos pensadores ao longo do tempo vêm reproduzindo visões confusas ...

  5. Há 3 dias · By ‘moral landscape’, he means the conceptual space of all possible experience. The peaks represent the heights of well-being, and the valleys the worst suffering. Different cultures and ethical practices are different ways of moving across this landscape – they can lead either up or down, and their effects are empirically ...

  6. www.samharris.org › books › the-moral-landscapeMaking Sense | Sam Harris

    Sam Harris argues that science can and should determine human values, based on the well-being of conscious creatures. He challenges moral relativism, religion, and the separation of facts and values, and offers a game-changing vision of morality.

  7. 1 de jan. de 2010 · Sam Harris argues that science can determine human values and that moral relativism is false. He proposes a \"moral landscape\" based on well-being and neuroscience, and criticizes religion and philosophy.