Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Includes Jaspers' Autobiography (with a new section on Heidegger), 24 critical essays, Jaspers' replies to his critics, and Jaspers' bibliography. Edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp. First appearance of this edition in English. Very good hardcover with DJ, from a personal collection (NOT ex-library).

    • (3)
    • Paul Arthur Schilpp
  2. 19 de mar. de 2014 · Jaspers' autobiography.--Descriptive and critical essays on the philosophy of Karl Jaspers.--The philosopher replies.--Bibliography of the writings of Karl Jaspers to spring, 1957, compiled by Kurt Rossmann (p. 871-887)

  3. 18 de mar. de 2021 · Authorized German translation of the book to be published in 1957: The philosophy of Karl Jaspers (Library of living philosophers, ed. by Paul A. Schilpp) Includes bibliographical references.

  4. 5 de jun. de 2006 · The central idea in Jaspers’s philosophy of religion is the concept of philosophical faith, set out most extensively in Der Philosophische Glaube (Philosophical Faith, 1948) and Der Philophische Glaube angesichts der christlichen Offenbarung (Philosophical Faith in face of Christian Revelation, 1962).

  5. 19 de out. de 2023 · The Philosophy of Karl Jaspers (Volume IX, 1957) Karl Jaspers created a uniquely humanistic existentialism. The depth and breadth of his philosophy is awesome. He was a psychopathologist, a philosophical anthropologist, and a political scientist.

  6. The Philosophy of Karl Jaspers, Volume 9 (Library of Living Philosophers. Paul Arthur Schilpp. 4.60. 5 ratings0 reviews. Book by Schilpp, Paul Arthur. Genres Philosophy. 934 pages, Hardcover. First published January 1, 1957. Book details & editions. About the author. Paul Arthur Schilpp. 55 books4 followers. Follow. Friends & Following.

  7. Most of karl jaspers' writings on great philosophers of the past have been translated into English. Three of these translations form a unit and will be discussed here.1 Jaspers presents his The Great Philosophers as a "world history of philoso phy." But it is quite different from what, since Hegel, has been expected of a history of philosophy.