Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. 5 de fev. de 2008 · The term “value theory” is used in at least three different ways in philosophy. In its broadest sense, “value theory” is a catch-all label used to encompass all branches of moral philosophy, social and political philosophy, aesthetics, and sometimes feminist philosophy and the philosophy of religion — whatever areas of ...

  2. 7 de abr. de 2015 · This Handbook focuses on value theory as it pertains to ethics, broadly construed, and its purpose is to provide a comprehensive and state-of-the-art overview of the debate. The Handbook is divided into three main parts.

  3. 5 de jun. de 2012 · Summary. Whatever the philosophical or methodological approach economists have taken to their discipline, whatever view they have taken of its scope, objectives and analytical techniques, the theory of value – with its associated theory of distribution – has been a key feature of the disciplinary matrix or paradigm to which they ...

  4. 7 de abr. de 2015 · This introduction characterizes and positions value theory, or axiology, as a philosophical discipline. It identifies its central issues and explains how value theory overlaps partly with other areas of moral philosophy, such as metaethics and normative etics, and how it relates other areas of philosophy.

  5. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Value_theoryValue theory - Wikipedia

    In ethics and the social sciences, value theory involves various approaches that examine how, why, and to what degree humans value things and whether the object or subject of valuing is a person, idea, object, or anything else. Within philosophy, it is also known as ethics or axiology.

  6. Abstract. For at least the past 120 years the discussion of the source of value has been dominated by the concept of marginal utility, originated by Jeavons in The Theory of Political Economy (1871), Menger in Principles of Economics (1871) and Walras in Elements of Pure Economics (1874).

  7. 3 de jan. de 2002 · In these essays, Joseph Raz examines the nature of normativity, reason, and the will; the justification of reason; and the objectivity of value. He argues for the centrality, but also demonstrates the limits of reason in action and belief.