Resultado da Busca
15 de mai. de 2024 · Charles Ranlett Flint. retrieved. 9 October 2017. stated in. Flint, Charles Ranlett (24 January 1850–12 February 1934), merchant and company promoter.
Charles Ranlett Flint (1850-1934) was a financial capitalist, merchant and industrial consolidator. He entered the shipping business and worked for commission merchants in New York City. Popularly known as the "Father of Trusts", he was responsible for many industrial consolidations and mergers. Collection consists of correspondence, agreements ...
Charles Ranlett Flint, né le à Thomaston ( États-Unis) et mort le à Washington ( États-Unis ), est un homme d'affaires américain connu en partie pour avoir fondé le trust Computing-Tabulating-Recording (qui deviendra IBM le 14 février 1924 ). Il est considéré aux États-Unis comme le « fondateur du trust ».
7 de dez. de 2019 · Charles Ranlett Flint was born in 1850 in Maine. The family soon moved to New York, where his father worked as the manager of a firm called Chapman & Flint. The family was business was set up in 1837, and served as a mercantile firm dealing in loans and fiscal help. Flint finished his graduation from the Brooklyn Polytechnic Institute in 1868 ...
[Ed. – Charles Ranlett Flint was among the biggest movers and shakers of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He was born in Maine in 1850, but moved to New York City and attended the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, graduating when he was just 18 years old.
Charles Ranlett Flint (January 24, 1850 – February 26, 1934) was the founder of the Computing-Tabulating-Recording Company which later became IBM. For his financial dealings, he earned the moniker "Father of Trusts". He was an avid sportsman and member of the syndicate that built the yacht Vigilant, that was the U.S. defender of the eighth America's Cup and was the owner of the yacht Gracie.
When Watson was recruited by Charles Ranlett Flint in 1914 to join the Computing-Tabulating Recording Company, the precursor to IBM, the company had been badly underperforming expectations. Worse, there was little cohesion among the employees, who had represented three distinct entities just a few years earlier.
