Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Laud was able to provide a telling rejoinder to this and similar accusations, if not an entire rebuttal In his recapitulation of his defence on 2 September 1644 Laud used his dealings with the Lutherans to rebut the charge that he was attempting to introduce popery ‘Lastly, there have been above threescore Letters and other papers brought out of my study into this honourable House, they are ...

  2. www.larousse.fr › personnage › William_LaudWilliam Laud - LAROUSSE

    William. Laud. Prélat anglais (Reading 1573-Londres 1645). Évêque de Londres (1628), puis archevêque de Canterbury (1633), il élabora la politique religieuse de Charles I er et défendit avec violence la prérogative royale. Prétendant imposer la stricte orthodoxie anglicane, il provoqua une puissante insurrection nationale (1637).

  3. nl.wikipedia.org › wiki › William_LaudWilliam Laud - Wikipedia

    William Laud ( Reading, 7 oktober 1573 – Londen, 10 januari 1645) was aartsbisschop van Canterbury van 1633 tot 1641. Hij zag het als zijn opdracht om de eenheid in de Anglicaanse Kerk te bewaren en trad daarom hard op tegen protestantse stromingen zoals het puritanisme. Hierdoor en door zijn steun aan Karel I van Engeland werd hij tijdens de ...

  4. digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk › collections › laudLaud - University of Oxford

    William Laud (1573-1645) was born at Reading, Berkshire, attended St John's College, Oxford, was ordained priest in 1601 and became Archbishop of Canterbury in 1633. Archbishop Laud's donation to the Library comprised 1242 volumes which were received in three main instalments in 1635, 1636 and 1639, and in smaller ones in 1640-1.

  5. 26 de nov. de 2009 · When Archbishop William Laud’s head was ‘cutt of[f] at one blow’, the responsibility for grasping the event’s significance passed to those people, both allies and enemies, whose printed accounts of and responses to his deeds and final words continued to define their meanings, frequently in dichotomous terms that failed to recognise their complex, collective nature.

  6. Report to Archbishop Laud. This is a report to William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury, from some of his informers. Laud had a network across the country that sent him regular reports about what people were saying. Throughout the 1630s Charles I and William Laud tried to change the organisation of the church and how people worshipped in church.

  7. William Laud was appointed archbishop of Canterbury by Charles I in 1633, and throughout his tenure of the office, he energetically promoted a form of high Anglo-Catholicism within the country. He found himself consistently at odds with the Reformers and Puritans.