Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey is a 1993 American remake of the 1963 film 30 years before, that was based on the original novel of the same name by Shelia Burnford. The movie was released in theatres on February 3rd, 1993. The movie grossed #41,833,324 worldwide. The movie got a sequel called Homeward Bound II: Lost in San Fransisco. The film is dedicated to producer Franklin R. Levy ...

  2. This thrilling and thoroughly captivating hit has become an instant favorite with audiences of all ages. You'll lose your heart to Chance, a fun-loving American bulldog pup, Sassy, a hilarious Himalayan cat who lives up to her name, and Shadow, a wise old golden retriever -- all of whom express themselves with very familiar human voices! The adventure begins when the loving owners of these ...

  3. This thrilling and thoroughly captivating hit has become an instant favorite with audiences of all ages. You'll lose your heart to Chance, a fun-loving ...

  4. 27 de abr. de 2016 · Copyright of this video is not claimed by the retroVHStrailers channel. All rights retained by the copyright holder. The retroVHStrailers channel does not mo...

    • 2 min
    • 574,6K
    • retro VHS trailers
  5. temporary care of a friend who lives hundreds of miles away. But after several days, the. worried animals begin to think their family must be in trouble, so they decide to head for. home. On their incredible journey across the ruggedly beautiful Sierras, they encounter. unexpected surprises from man, beast, and nature alike.

  6. Beautiful, interesting, incredible cinema. 6.1. /10. 225 Ratings. Remake of the popular Disney classic, this time featuring some well known voices as two dogs and a cat trek across America encountering all sorts of adventures in the quest to be reunited with their owners.

  7. 3 de fev. de 1993 · I just about, marginally, liked the 1963 film, whereas I actually did comfortably enjoy 'Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey'. The animals are as adorable in this as they are in the first film, with more definitive care taken for them - that's not, arguably, the case in the '63 production.