Yahoo Search Busca da Web

Resultado da Busca

  1. Leonardo Da Vinci, a Memory of His Childhood by Sigmund Freud. Publication date 2017 Publisher Independently Published Collection internetarchivebooks; printdisabled

  2. what constitutes historical evidences. In these senses, Leonardo de Vinci and a Memory of His Childhood is both an exercise in hermeneutics and in rhetorical persuasion. Freud is not only offering an exegesis of the various clues—notebooks, dreams, memories, paintings, and record, he is also trying to create for his readers a mystery story.

  3. 25 de jun. de 2020 · Abstract. Previous considerations of Freud’s 1910 pathography of Leonardo da Vinci have grappled mainly with errors of fact (among them a mistranslation in the study’s signature childhood memory, widely known since the 1950s). Here a more consequential flaw is examined: Freud’s fatefully pathogenic framing of Leonardo’s homosexuality.

  4. Judul asli : Leonardo da Vinci and a memory of his childhood, New York--London, 1989 Bibliografi : halaman 156-162: Bahasa: Indonesia: Bentuk Karya: Bukan fiksi : Target Pembaca: Umum: Lokasi Akses Online

  5. 1 de jun. de 2020 · Previous considerations of Freud’s 1910 pathography of Leonardo da Vinci have grappled mainly with errors of fact (among them a mistranslation in the study’s signature childhood memory, widely known since the 1950s). Here a more consequential flaw is examined: Freud’s fatefully pathogenic framing of Leonardo’s homosexuality. While few present-day analysts share that perspective in its ...

  6. Leonardo da Vinci: A Memory of His Childhood. Sigmund Freud. Taylor & Francis, Jan 22, 2002 - Psychology - 96 pages. A reconstruction of Leonardo's emotional life from his earliest years, it represents Freud's first sustained venture into biography from a psychoanalytic perspective, and also his effort to trace one route that homosexual ...

  7. Reconsidering Leonardo Da Vinci and a Memory of His Childhood. Previous considerations of Freud's 1910 pathography of Leonardo da Vinci have grappled mainly with errors of fact (among them a mistranslation in the study's signature childhood memory, widely known since the 1950s). Here a more consequential flaw is examined: Freud's fatefully ...